Home About Us Performance Trustees Professional Associations Bylaws

Investment Policy Social Responsibility Mechanics of Investing in the DIT

DIT Account  Statements Contact Information

 

CELEBRATING 200 YEARS OF PRUDENT INVESTING

           
 

DIT PERFORMANCE (As of December 31, 2011) A fourth quarter commentary appears below.

                 
 

Average Annual Returns

     4th Qtr

     YTD

 1-year

 3-year

 5-year

 10-year

 

Stock Fund

     9.4%

    -4.9%

   -4.9%

 13.5%

  -2.2%

   3.6%

 

S&P 500

    11.8%

     2.1%

    2.1%

 14.1%

  -0.3%

   2.9%

 

               
 

Income Fund

     1.1%

      7.0%

    7.0%

 10.6%

   7.6%

   6.6%

 
 

Citicorp BIG Index

     1.1%

      7.9%

    7.9%

   8.0%

   6.7%

   5.9%

 
           
           

                 

Management Fees per Annum

       
 

Stock Fund

 

     0.95%

           
 

Income Fund

 

     0.50%

         
 

   

Performance information is provided on a quarterly basis by Prime, Buchholz & Associates based on security valuations furnished by State Street Corporation. The average annual returns reflect changes in unit values and assume the automatic reinvestment of dividends. The returns are before management fees.

 

Fourth Quarter Commentary

January 13, 2011

Dear DIT Participant:

With Greece tottering on the brink of insolvency, concern about the viability of the Euro zone helped precipitate a flight to quality in the second half on 2011. The flight, which began in the third quarter and extended into the fourth, favored U.S. Treasuries over other forms of domestic and international debt, defensive over cyclical stocks, large cap over mid and small cap stocks, and U.S. stocks over foreign and especially emerging market stocks.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the DIT Income Fund posted a 1.1% total return compared to 1.1% for its benchmark, the Citicorp Broad Investment Grade Index, while the DIT’s Stock Fund, with its mid cap, small cap and foreign stock exposures, produced a 9.4% return versus 11.8% for its benchmark, the large cap S&P 500 Index. For the year, the Income Fund posted a 7.0% total return compared to 7.9% for the Citicorp Broad Investment Grade Index, while the Stock Fund produced a -4.9% return versus 2.1% for the S&P 500 Index. Although in the aggregate the Stock Fund’s managers underperformed the Stock Fund’s S&P 500 benchmark in 2011, they matched their allocation index for the year; an identically allocated portfolio of index funds would have returned -4.8%. (A weak performance by the Stock Fund’s domestic, large cap growth manager was the chief cause of the DIT’s slight 0.1% underperformance vs. the allocation index.)

The Stock Fund's substantial international exposure in 2011 dampened the Fund’s overall results despite a strong performance by the DIT's principal international equity manager. Nevertheless, the Trustees of Donations (TOD) continue to believe that in the long run DIT participants will benefit from a diversified and globally oriented asset class mix, one that we will continue to refine in 2012.  In November we hired a new investment advisor, Prime, Buchholz & Associates. The advisory firm’s recently completed analysis of the DIT’s Stock and Income Fund portfolios will provide a fresh perspective on the TOD’s asset allocation strategy and a new point of departure for ongoing efforts to adjust the strategy to long-term, global economic trends.

The TOD continues to recommend a 40% Income Fund / 60% Stock Fund allocation for investments in the DIT. Management fees remain at 0.50% annually for the Income Fund and 0.95% annually for the Stock Fund.  There are no additional fees imposed on shareholder assets.

 As always, the TOD welcomes invitations from EDOM parishes and affiliated organizations to discuss existing or prospective investments in the DIT. A meeting with TOD representatives can be arranged by calling the DIT's Investment Coordinator, Mr. Richard Blakney, at (617) 482-4826 ext. 557 or by emailing him at rblakney@diomass.org.     

The following commentary has been provided by DIT’s Income Fund manager, Standish Mellon Asset Management Company:

Market Environment - Although 2011 began with optimism, it quickly evaporated. Starting with the unrest in the Middle East and North Africa which pushed oil prices much higher, and then coupled with a tragic earthquake and tsunami in Japan which pushed growth expectations lower, the economic outlook darkened.  Later in the second quarter, Europe became the market’s focus as a Greek default became a high probability event and the European peripheral countries’ borrowing rates, including Italy, started to move much wider.  In late July, the debt ceiling extension in the US took center stage, when the political picture darkened as Congress showed signs of complete dysfunction and there was a resultant downgrade by S&P of the US credit rating.  Fears of a Euro currency break down and banking crisis rose and markets became even more volatile in the third and fourth quarter. Above all this year, concerns rose about the effectiveness of policy makers in the developed world. 

Against this backdrop, US rates gapped lower in July and August, and remained low with the ten-year Treasury ending the year more than 100 bps lower than it began.  The Federal Reserve debated more stimuli, but held off as US growth showed signs of picking up in the second half of the year. US equity markets sold off sharply in the third quarter, but made up some of that ground and finished the year up 2.09%.

The sentiment of bond investors shifted over the closing quarter of 2011 as positive signs of US economic activity helped offset the ongoing worries that persisted regarding the European debt crisis. Spread product outperformed over the quarter despite coming under pressure in November, as investors again became cautious. As measured by the Citigroup BIG Index, the US bond market returned 1.09 % over the quarter and 7.85% for the year. 

Sector Performance - For all of 2011, Treasury and agencies outperformed along with the higher rated CMBS and ABS sectors, both perceived as insulated from Europe.  Interest rates were meaningfully lower for the year, the ten-year Treasury ending December at 1.88% down 141bps. The yield curve flattened over 100 bps from 2-10 years with no room to move lower in short maturities. High quality, short duration ABS was the outperformer of the year, besting Treasuries with 0.52% of excess return in contrast to Corporates which lagged Treasuries by -3.67 %, as the financial sector came under renewed selling pressure, and long corporates trailed Treasuries by a large margin.

However, in the final quarter, spread sectors proved to be the main focus of investors as risk aversion diminished allowing credit spreads to narrow over the fourth quarter.  CMBS was the top performer by a wide margin, posting an excess return of 2.5% as investors again favored the sector as fundamentals continued to improve and new supply was low. Corporate bonds benefitted from the improved economic outlook despite sizeable issuance as borrowers looked to lock-in low yields and returned 0.82% versus Treasuries. Agency MBS also beat Treasuries, with an excess return of 0.24%, helped by low origination volumes. Outside of the index, high yield bonds returned 6.5% for the quarter and emerging market debt had a total return of 5.1%.

For the quarter and year end, the Trustees of Donation portfolio finished relatively flat to the Citigroup BIG Index returning 1.03% and 7.84%, respectively.  For most of the year, we were shorter than the index duration position which detracted modestly to performance while exposure to ABS and CMBS contributed positively. 

Outlook - Markets remain tough to navigate as politics and policy rule the day in the US and Europe.  A rational solution in Europe remains possible, but very complicated.  The US economy continues to move along at a reasonable rate and consumers have been somewhat constructive in spite of low confidence numbers earlier in the year.  Any market perception of a solution in Europe would be very positive for risk assets and negative for US rates, but the path remains a rocky one. 

From a portfolio perspective, while there are pockets of cheap valuation and rates certainly are low in the Treasury markets, we remain defensive in posture as volatility reigns and policy errors are highly likely. 

Nonetheless, in this environment we expect fixed income portfolios overall to perform well and expect to find opportunities to take advantage of value in the market to add return.